The Orgasm Gap: ‘We have this frustrating myth that sex is easy and innate’

Aoife Drury

Single parenting in a pandemic: ‘I cry alone in the car so the kids don’t...

Lia Hynes

Author Ruth Gilligan: ‘I have slowly colonised our flat’s small second bedroom into my writing...

Sophie Grenham

About 400,000 women in Ireland have this condition and don’t know

IMAGE

The Cabinet Sub-Committee on Covid-19 currently has no women sitting on it. Why?

Lynn Enright

GALLERY: Beautiful gowns from The Golden Globes through the years

Jennifer McShane

Practical and stylish: 12 baskets we absolutely love for every budget

Megan Burns

Tiger King season 2 is coming – and Carole Baskin has some thoughts

Jennifer McShane

Get out of your head: What to do when you mistrust your gut instinct

Niamh Ennis

Image / Agenda / Breaking Stories

CervicalCheck Tribunal: Vicky Phelan says patients’ concerns have been completely ignored


by Megan Burns
22nd Oct 2020

Vicky Phelan via Twitter

Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly announced October 27 as the start date for the CervicalCheck Tribunal, but campaigner Vicky Phelan says the concerns of women and families affected have been ignored.


With the announcement by Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly that the CervicalCheck Tribunal would commence work on October 27, campaigner Vicky Phelan expressed her anger at “a flat rejection of all of our concerns”.

The tribunal, which was supposed to begin in March, had been delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic, and is intended to act as an alternative to legal proceedings for those affected by misread cervical cancer screenings. There are 203 active claims related to the the CervicalCheck scandal, while a further eight have been resolved.

On Twitter, Vicky Phelan raised a number of ways in which the announcement ignores the issues raised by CervicalCheck patient support group, 221+.

Firstly, she was shocked at the minister’s announcement came on the same day that the group received a letter informing them of the tribunal’s start date, giving them no prior warning that the start date was so imminent, not to mention that this date falls just as the country is going back into its highest level of lockdown.

“The @221plus women & families who this Tribunal is aimed at, were not afforded an opportunity to respond to the Minister’s decision to formally establish the Tribunal BEFORE it was announced.” Vicky tweeted. “As we have become used to, those most affected are often the last to know.”

She goes on to explain that the group met the minister six weeks ago over video call and outlined several concerns about the tribunal, all of which, she says, have been rejected by this announcement.

Firstly, she says, they asked for a non-adversarial route to be found for the Tribunal, one not requiring women to fight the labs which misread their tests.

“Women could instead rely on the non-delegable duty owed to them by the HSE, who were found primarily responsible for the cervical screening programme in the Morrissey case. The HSE could then rely on their contractual and legal indemnities against the lab,” Vicky says.

“The Minister rejected these arguments and set out in his letter how the laboratories MUST be involved in proceedings if taken before the Tribunal. This will NOT be acceptable to many of our members.”

Secondly, she explains that they asked that applicants to the Tribunal who receive an award be allowed to return to the Tribunal should they suffer a recurrence of their cancer. She gives the example of how the State allowed applicants in the Hepatitis C Tribunal to return if their health deteriorated.

This right, she points out, would be preferable to the High Court rules, which do not allow a return, however she says the minister did not address this concern at all.

Thirdly, Vicky points out that the group is concerned that the Statute of Limitations may prevent some of their members getting justice.

“We explained to the Minister that some of our members have received legal advice that they may now be statute-barred because they relied on the Government’s promise of a ‘non-adversarial’ Tribunal and did not issue HC proceedings.”

“These members may now, through no fault of their own, be statute-barred because of delays by Government of more than two years in establishing this Tribunal. The Minister did not address this issue.”

She concludes by saying that the Tribunal therefore does not prioritise the needs of the women affected, and asks the minister to reconsider. If it does go ahead in the current format, she says, they will be recommending that members of 221+ do not participate.

Featured image: Vicky Phelan


Read more: Cancer and Covid-19: “I finished radiotherapy in January. I haven’t seen a doctor since February”

Read more: Video: Vicky Phelan does experiment with her son to highlight the importance of hand-washing

Read more: Meath woman who lived through Spanish flu offers message of hope on her 107th birthday

 

 

Also Read

vaccine delay
BREAKING STORIES
Ireland’s vaccine delay: What exactly is going on?

There’s been a lot of chat about a vaccine delay...

By Lauren Heskin

IMAGE WRITES
Family of Irish man stuck in China: ‘His mental health and physical health are so low, it can’t get any worse’

Richard O’Halloran has been held in China for two years....

By Lia Hynes

BUSINESS
GM of the Intercontinental Dublin Nicky Logue takes his office on the go with this handy tech

It’s not just a new device, it’s a whole new...

By IMAGE

Pamela Anderson
BREAKING STORIES
Pamela Anderson has written the Taoiseach a letter

No, you read that right Think of the most ridiculous...

By Holly O'Neill

AGENDA
#JobFairy: We’re looking for a staff writer at IMAGE.ie

IMAGE Media is the premier destination for women curated by...

By IMAGE

BREAKING STORIES
Ireland’s shops reopen today: here’s what you need to know

Deciding whether to make the trek to the shops today?...

By Erin Lindsay

premium BUSINESS, IMAGE WRITES, REAL-LIFE STORIES, RELATIONSHIPS
Does Only Fans take advantage of women’s economic precarity? Or give back financial power?

Finn McRedmond asks, should we raise concern over a business model that thrives on the economically vulnerable?

By Finn McRedmond

BREAKING STORIES
‘Risk of further incitement of violence’: Donald Trump permanently banned from Twitter

In an unprecedented move,  Donald Trump has been permanently suspended...

By Jennifer McShane