Top of our wish list: candles that are maybe too pretty to burn

Megan Burns

The state of the fashion trend: Do they still exist or matter?

Marie Kelly

This gorgeous redbrick home in Rathmines is on the market for €825,000

Lauren Heskin

Boudoir photoshoots: ‘I wanted to create a place for women who don’t currently love their...

Jennifer McShane

Join this virtual event, where global leaders ask ‘what’s next’ for businesses, live events and...

Shayna Sappington

Marie Kelly always hated her brows. Until she had them tattooed.

Marie Kelly

What’s on this weekend: March 5-7

Lauren Heskin

Covid life: How to parent when you have no answers for them

Amanda Cassidy

Kevin Dundon’s courgette and feta pasta salad


Image / Editorial

‘The best of 2019’: Twitter reacts to watching Netflix’s The Irishman

by Jennifer McShane
27th Nov 2019

The Irishman is coldly enthralling, it vividly depicts the glamour of mobster life in the 1950s. But even the most powerful figures in organised crime can’t escape the harsh reality of ageing in this sprawling epic. The lack of women’s voices is highly noticeable, but this is Scors­ese’s best in years. Read on for our review and some social media reaction 

In 2019, it seems the greatest directors among us fear their best days have been and gone. We saw it through the kaleidoscope of melancholy in Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and now Martin Scorsese takes a cooler approach on the subject. The Irishman (premiering in cinemas next week and released on Netflix November 27) isn’t a warm feature. It’s slick, modern and long, clocking in at three-and-a-half hours running time. But it has the same impact – you know you’re watching a master craftsman at his best: a film that’s steely, ominous and stylish.

Scorsese, working from a script by screenwriter Steven Zaillian who adapted the 2004 memoir I Heard You Paint Houses (a eu­phemism for splat­ter­ing the walls with blood), tells the true story of Frank Sheeran (a brilliantly refined Robert De Niro), a World War II veteran and unassuming truck driver who, in the 1950s, suddenly finds himself drawn into the criminal orbit of Russell Bufalino (a fantastic, elegant Joe Pesci), the sinister boss of the Pennsylvania-based Bufalino crime family.

Ray Ramano (Bill Bufalino), Al Pacino (Jimmy Hoffa) and Robert De Niro (Frank Sheeran)

Standout performances

Sheeran, who quickly became a trusted mob soldier and hitman, rose through the ranks and was required to work alongside fellow mob boss Jimmy Hoffa (played by Al Pachino, who gives the most extraordinary performance of the film). Hoffa was no ordinary public figure – the labour leader was hugely popular with his Teamsters Union and mired in underworld connections (obviously) – so the pairing seemed a natural choice. Sheeran served as Hoffa’s right hand for years and the two became firm friends, their families intertwined, until a problem surfaces: the top bosses, Hoffa and Bufalino, begin to clash and Sheeran, loyal to both, is caught in between the two.

The film depicts the ebb and flow of the mob underworld in the usual Scors­ese style – with echoes of his previous gangster films obvious throughout – but is fresh and new at the same time. There’s also plenty of black humour throughout which eases the ever-building tension but Marty avoids the pitfalls of say, The Wolf of Wall Street where the scenarios never veer too over the top even while trying to get a laugh from the audience.

De-ageing technology

If you’ve heard anything about the film, you will have heard of the revolutionary de-ageing technology the director used to make younger men of the now aged, veteran actors (the story spans decades so we meet them from their thirties onwards). If you think it’s a gimmick, it’s not, and it’s so artfully done, that you very quickly forget it’s been applied at all – such is the skill of the actors on screen. In the hands of lesser actors, using such drastic techniques might have posed a problem, but these are not lesser and it shows.

They age into their later years (as well as regain youth) and Scorsese goes to great pains to show that no matter the man, age finds a way to humanise and make vulnerable even the most powerful 

Ultimately, it’s a slow burner, one best taken in at a leisurely pace, taking note of the differing narrative threads.

A lack of female voices

The absence of women’s voices in The Irishman is particularly glaring; [Anna Paquin] says so few words you’d forget she was there

For all the film’s highlights and even though this is a male-dominated film, the absence of women is notable. A mention must be given to actress Anna Paquin who, playing Peggy, the adult daughter of Sheeran, says so much, while saying nothing at all. She’s enigmatic on screen but even so, her silence and the absence of women’s voices in The Irishman is particularly glaring; she says so few words you’d forget she was there, and the other females in the film serve as token wives who also have little to say. Lucy Gallina, who plays the younger version of Peggy, is much more prominent. But they still both have a noticeable lack of dialogue. Both Gallina and Paquin do a lot with the little they’re given to work with — and it speaks volumes about the skill of both.

“If the story doesn’t call for it…It’s a waste of everybody’s time,” is what the director said when asked of this at a press conference and while he makes a valid point, he’s never gone out of his way when it comes to featuring multi-faceted, diverse female characters on screen. And it’s noticeable and a shame.

In an era when we’re seeing the rise of women both on screen and behind it – Scorsese’s reasoning that Paquin’s character is more powerful saying only a single sentence throughout, is an interesting one, to say the least, and will no doubt be the subject of much debate.

The reaction 

Here’s what Twitter had to say about the Netflix premiere on Wednesday:

The Irishman is now on Netflix

Main photograph: @ThePlaylist