WIN a full head of luxury hair extensions
WIN a full head of luxury hair extensions

IMAGE

Everything you need to know about Simone Rocha’s menswear debut
Everything you need to know about Simone Rocha’s menswear debut

Paul McLauchlan

Real Weddings: Inside Karen and Eoin’s Dublin city wedding
Real Weddings: Inside Karen and Eoin’s Dublin city wedding

IMAGE

Shopkeepers: Macbees Killarney
Shopkeepers: Macbees Killarney

Lauren Heskin

Page Turners: ‘Love Forms’ author Claire Adam
Page Turners: ‘Love Forms’ author Claire Adam

Sarah Gill

IMAGE Business Club events return to The Westbury
IMAGE Business Club events return to The Westbury

IMAGE

The must-have accessories for every groom on their wedding day
The must-have accessories for every groom on their wedding day

Lawson Mpame

‘This is a use-forever type of skincare range’
‘This is a use-forever type of skincare range’

Edaein OConnell

An architect has gently restored her thatched Tipperary cottage to improve flow
An architect has gently restored her thatched Tipperary cottage to improve flow

Megan Burns

My Start-Up Story: Mizz Rio founder and designer Mags Morgan
My Start-Up Story: Mizz Rio founder and designer Mags Morgan

IMAGE

Image / Agenda / Breaking Stories

Meghan Markle sues over paparazzi picture taken of Archie


By Holly O'Neill
04th Sep 2020
Meghan Markle sues over paparazzi picture taken of Archie

The Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle and her son Archie are suing a paparazzi agency over pictures of them taken in a park on Vancouver Island


The Duchess of Sussex is suing a paparazzi agency over photographs taken in January of her and her son Archie, using a ruling won by JK Rowling which protects the privacy of celebrities’ children.

Photographs taken of Meghan and Archie in a baby carrier walking with two dogs on Vancouver Island following the announcement that the duke and duchess would step down as royals were “private information” that was “misused” says the duchess.

The case is being brought in the names of Meghan and Archie against Splash, a picture agency in LA and London. The UK agency says the photographs were “an important matter of public interest” following the duke and duchess’ decision to step down as senior royals, saying the duchess did not have reasonable expectation of privacy in Horth Hill Regional Park where they were photographed, that Archie’s face was not shown and that no Canadian laws were broken.

According to Jonathan Barnes who is representing the duchess and Archie, Splash claims that Meghan “knew everything that was going on and was a volunteer in the sense that she carried on walking when she knew she was being photographed.” The photographs, which are still on sale, were taken with a long lens and Barnes says that the duchess and her son were “papped… without their acquiescence or consent”.

The duchess and Archie had a “reasonable expectation of privacy” says Barnes, citing JK Rowling’s court ruling in 2008 (over pictures taken of her son) that protects celebrities’ children from being photographed without their parents’ permission, unless their parents have exposed their children to publicity.

Splash have previously paid damages to Prince Harry in 2018 for helicopter photographs taken of his Cotswolds home.

Read more: This dreamy Kilkenny photo shoot has got us excited for weddings again

Read more: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to make shows with Netflix

Read more: 12 stylish A/W boots that will pass the test of time