Social Pictures: The launch of JYSK’s 2024 garden collection
Social Pictures: The launch of JYSK’s 2024 garden collection

Sarah Gill

This Dublin home has been given a makeover full of warm tones and inviting textures
This Dublin home has been given a makeover full of warm tones and inviting textures

Megan Burns

5 inspiring self-help books that will change your life
5 inspiring self-help books that will change your life

Jennifer McShane

This deceptively spacious cottage is on the market for €845,000
This deceptively spacious cottage is on the market for €845,000

Sarah Finnan

How should we speak to teens about consent?
How should we speak to teens about consent?

Amanda Cassidy

Can ChatGPT replace me as a writer?
Can ChatGPT replace me as a writer?

Esther O'Moore Donohoe

The Bee Pods: Donegal glamping done right
The Bee Pods: Donegal glamping done right

Sarah Gill

Supper Club: Chicken satay skewers with peanut dip
Supper Club: Chicken satay skewers with peanut dip

Meg Walker

Meet Nancy Harris – the award-winning Irish playwright and screenwriter behind The Dry
Meet Nancy Harris – the award-winning Irish playwright and screenwriter behind The Dry

Meg Walker

This ivy-adorned red brick on Ailesbury Road is on the market for €12 million
This ivy-adorned red brick on Ailesbury Road is on the market for €12 million

Sarah Finnan

Image / Editorial

Rihanna Strikes Again


By Jeanne Sutton
04th Jun 2014
Rihanna Strikes Again

The ad for her perfume has been deemed unfit for display in areas where children might see it…

Another day, another controversy involving Rihanna. Fresh from that sheer gown at this week’s CFDA awards ceremony – see the skinny from Image Daily on that old chestnut here – and her banishment from Instagram because of shots of her topless on the cover a French magazine, it seems Rihanna’s body brings with it a neverending round of scandal. This time the Advertising Standards Authority in the UK has deemed the print and poster advertisement for her new perfume as ‘sexually suggestive? and declared it should not be displayed in areas where children are likely to see it.

rihanna_dress_5

The image of an apparently naked Rihanna resting her raised legs, clad in the highest of heels, against a bottle of her upcoming Rogue scent prompted one person to complain it was offensively sexual, demeaning to women and not suitable for children to see. Parlux Fragrances, the company creating Rouge, defended the ad claiming the nudity not improper and the image was not offensive, suggestive or demeaning.

The advertising watchdog conceded on these points, noting that Rihanna had a facial expression “of defiance rather than vulnerability” and her supposed nudity was actually covered up. However the authority did issue ?a placement restriction to reduce the possibility of it (the ad) being seen by children.? They continued, “While we did not consider the image to be overtly sexual, we considered that Rihanna’s pose, with her legs raised in the air, was provocative.?

We suspect Rihanna is filing this whole week and all the accompanying press clippings in the DGAF chapter of her memoir.

Jeanne Sutton @jeannedesutun

Sold out!